If aperpb then a·b=0 . Does the converse hold?
If $\vec{a}\perp\vec{b}$ then $\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}=0$. Does the converse hold?
Explanation of Method
Perpendicularity and a zero scalar product — the statement and its converse.
Step 1: Direct statement
If $\vec{a}\perp\vec{b}$, then $\theta = 90^\circ$ and
\[ \vec{a}\cdot\vec{b} = |\vec{a}||\vec{b}|\cos 90^\circ = 0. \qquad\blacksquare \]
Step 2: The converse
The converse holds for non-zero vectors. If $\vec a\cdot\vec b=0$ with $\vec a\neq\vec 0$, $\vec b\neq\vec 0$, then
\[ \cos\theta = \frac{\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}}{|\vec{a}||\vec{b}|} = 0, \qquad \theta\in[0^\circ,180^\circ] \;\Longrightarrow\; \theta = 90^\circ, \] so $\vec{a}\perp\vec{b}$. $\blacksquare$
Exception: if $\vec a=\vec 0$ (or $\vec b=\vec 0$), then $\vec a\cdot\vec b=0$ for every $\vec b$, although the zero vector has no direction. Many texts adopt the convention that $\vec 0$ is perpendicular to every vector; with it the equivalence holds without exception.
\[\vec{a}\neq\vec{0},\ \vec{b}\neq\vec{0}:\qquad \vec{a}\perp\vec{b} \iff \vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}=0\]
Step 3: Application: the orths
\[ \vec{i}\cdot\vec{j} = \vec{j}\cdot\vec{k} = \vec{i}\cdot\vec{k} = 0, \qquad \vec{i}\cdot\vec{i} = \vec{j}\cdot\vec{j} = \vec{k}\cdot\vec{k} = 1. \]
Result
| Case | $\vec a\cdot\vec b$ | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| $\vec a\perp\vec b$, both non-zero | $0$ | $\theta=90^\circ$ |
| $\vec a\cdot\vec b=0$, both non-zero | $0$ | $\vec a\perp\vec b$ |
| $\vec a=\vec 0$ | $0$ | angle undefined (perpendicular by convention) |